Sport
By signing Nick Foles the Jaguars are making the same mistake all over again
12
Mar
Mar
By signing Nick Foles the Jaguars are making the same mistake all over again
The Jaguars did it again. They outbid themselves for another mediocre quarterback. Last year it was Blake Bortles. This year, it’s Nick Foles.
Foles will reportedly sign a four-year, $88 million deal, including $50.2 million in guarantees, when free agency officially opens on Wednesday. This comes one year after the team gave Bortles a three-year, $54 million extension. To make room for Foles’ contract, the Jaguars will cut Bortles and eat $16.5 million in dead money. Jacksonville is using A LOT of its cap space on the quarterback position and it’s difficult to even say that they’ve made a major upgrade.
Let’s just ignore the early part of Foles career and focus on the last two seasons, which is when he really earned that contract. Since 2017, Bortles has a higher yards-per-attempt (6.9 to 6.2), a near-identical adjusted net yards per attempt, which factors in touchdowns, interceptions and sacks, (6.48 to 6.49) and has rushed for 687 yards and three touchdowns compared to Foles’ 20 rush yards.
Jacksonville just forked over $50 million in guarantees for a marginal upgrade over this…
Foles is a better quarterback — in that, he can actually throw a football — but he’s not significantly better than Bortles is. When factoring in the money, you could make the argument that the Jaguars are worse off at the quarterback position now than they were 24 hours ago. Foles and Bortles will account for at least $30 million in cap space next season. That’s $30 million on maybe the least enviable QB situation in the league!
One of the biggest knocks against Bortles — and certainly one I’ve pointed out — is that his limited skill-set forced the Jaguars coaching staff to dumb down their offense in order for him to have even a modicum of success. Well, nothing will change now that Foles is coming aboard. The Eagles had to do the same thing when he played over the last two seasons, as I wrote a few weeks back…
New offensive coordinator John DeFilippo worked on the Eagles staff when Foles led the team to the Super Bowl, so he’ll know how to get the best out of Foles, but the best of Foles is hardly better (if at all) than what Bortles has given the Jags over the last two years. And Bortles did it with a battered supporting cast.
We know the Jaguars overpaid for Foles. No rational person will argue against that. The better question is why did they feel the need to overpay for him? Who else was bidding for Nick Foles? Every team outside of Miami seems to have its starting QB already on the roster, and those that don’t will likely address that need in the draft. Just like with the Bortles extension, NO TEAM would have paid the price the Jaguars did. Jacksonville was bidding against itself to overpay a below average starter — a year after making the same mistake.
